My attention was drawn to a recent TV programme here in France on the use of this category in our world of wine.
Chaptalisation is the technical word for it – or to be more accurate "overchaptalisation", via pesticides or other treatments for vines, Application of SO2 to crops to prevent any acetic transformation (the road leading to "vinegar"), exogenous yeast… The lot were all mixed together in the program and so my only comment would be that the presenter was just underlining the simplistic patter of the representative of the pesticide industries at the agricultural show and so you have the right to hear a simpler vision of the truth.
As I keep saying to those who are surprised when I tell them, the most important job in the cheese making process today is certainly that of the R&D specialist in "starters", which are added to the milk to "acidify" it, as well as "taste precursors" . One of the researchers was heard to comment on the subject of doubtful chemical additives: "and do you think that in making wine they just leave it all to the fermentation of the grape juice?"
But do note: certain wine makers do just that and I'm not criticizing those who don't! Each to keep to his own craft and, as we say, the cows will be well looked after!
So let the person who has never sinned throw the first stone … What would you do if you saw your crop deteriorating two weeks before harvest? What would you do if the market is saying your wine must taste the same year after year (the result of standardization)? What would you do if in order to appeal to certain wine judges, you must produce a particular type of wine – and you know that this is the way to sell all your production without dropping your prices? What to do also should your wine develop a smell like a stable of horses, which makes it practically undrinkable (due to brettanomyces).
Or looked at another way, is it fair to be thrown out from an "appellation" because you are making "atypical" wine, when all you are doing is respecting the laws of nature?
I have great sympathy for the opinions of the SEVE association and of Claude Bourguignon. He has set up with his wife the LAMS laboratory for the microbiological study of soils.
To me, it seems quite normal to watch over both the well being of one's vines as that of one's cows. Should we accept grapes becoming "fat" under the influence of NPK (Nitrate, Potassium, Phosphorous) fertilizer, leading to a shortage of oligo-elements and a need for treatment – and to kill the micro-organisms in the soil – and at the same time should we judge a cow only by its milk yield?
Just let's remember this saying of André Valadier, ex-President of the French National Committee for PDO Milk Products (INAO): "For a cheese to feel at ease in its rind, the milk should feel at ease in the teat and the cow at ease in its mind.
Well, I think one might say: "for a wine to feel at ease in its bottle, the grape should feel at ease on its vine and the vine in its soil".
But that's just me talking… an over-simplification … you just rely on your own taste buds (not on anybody else's opinions!)
Recent Comments